Current:Home > FinanceMontana voters reject so-called 'Born Alive' ballot measure -AssetScope
Montana voters reject so-called 'Born Alive' ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-18 19:49:42
Montana voters rejected a measure that would have required medical workers to provide care to infants born prematurely or in rare instances of surviving an attempted abortion or face penalties, according to a call by the Associated Press. Critics say that infanticide is already illegal and the proposed amendment was unnecessary.
If LR-131, a legislative referendum for the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, had passed, medical professionals who did not "take medically appropriate and reasonable actions" could have faced punishments of up to $50,000 in fines and up to 20 years in prison.
The measure declared that an embryo or fetus is a legal person with a right to medical care if born prematurely or survives an attempted abortion, among other birth scenarios.
Members of the medical community opposed the amendment saying it represents government overreach in decisions made between a patient and provider. They say in instances where a baby is born early or with fetal anomalies, doctors will be forced to perform painful and unnecessary procedures that will keep the family from spending the final moments with their infant.
Republican proponents of the initiative said it was morally necessary to protect babies that survive an attempted abortion even though instances of this occurring are rare.
In 2002 a federal law granted infants born alive the same rights as persons but did not mandate care or include penalties. Eighteen states have passed similar laws.
Abortion continues to be legal in Montana. The state's constitution protects it under its right to privacy.
More Election 2022 coverage
- Montana Election Results
- More Election Coverage from Yellowstone Public Radio
veryGood! (19292)
Related
- As Trump Enters Office, a Ripe Oil and Gas Target Appears: An Alabama National Forest
- Biden Signs Sweeping Orders to Tackle Climate Change and Rollback Trump’s Anti-Environment Legacy
- Fracking’s Costs Fall Disproportionately on the Poor and Minorities in South Texas
- Indiana Supreme Court ruled near-total abortion ban can take effect
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Trump EPA Proposes Weaker Coal Ash Rules, More Use at Construction Sites
- Methodology for Mapping the Cities With the Unhealthiest Air
- New Details Revealed About Wild 'N Out Star Jacky Oh's Final Moments
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- When do student loan payments resume? Here's what today's Supreme Court ruling means for the repayment pause.
Ranking
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Solar Plans for a Mined Kentucky Mountaintop Could Hinge on More Coal Mining
- Climate Scientists Take Their Closest Look Yet at the Warming Impact of Aviation Emissions
- Environmental Justice Knocks Loudly at the White House
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- How Much Global Warming Is Fossil Fuel Infrastructure Locking In?
- What is the Higher Education Act —and could it still lead to student loan forgiveness?
- In Detroit, Fighting Hopelessness With a Climate Plan
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Oil Giants See a Future in Offshore Wind Power. Their Suppliers Are Investing, Too.
Fact Check: Did Kamala Harris Sue Exxon Over Climate Change?
Parkland shooting sheriff's deputy Scot Peterson found not guilty on all counts
'Most Whopper
A Tale of Two Leaks: Fixed in California, Ignored in Alabama
Read full text of the Supreme Court decision on web designer declining to make LGBTQ wedding websites
Congress Extends Tax Breaks for Clean Energy — and Carbon Capture